icwj logo

INTERFAITH COALITION FOR WORKER JUSTICE
OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN

Home

About Us

Why ICWJ?

ICWJ Board

ICWJ in
     the News

Newsletter

Donors

How to Help

 

Links

September 2004 Newsletter

IN THIS ISSUE

Dove

A Word from the Director
Wage Claim Enforcement-ICWJ Meets with District Attorney

Labor in the Pulpits Spotlight
Madison's New Minimum Wage
Madison Rejects Cintas Contract

Lands' End Update-Just Garments' Union Recognized
Workers' Rights Center Spotlight

Give to the ICWJ
Become an ICWJ volunteer!

A Word from the Director
shatz.jpg (253659 bytes)
Dear Friend of the ICWJ,

Greetings and as we approach the celebrations of the Jewish New Year, I wish you all a healthy, happy, and sweet New Year.  l'Shanah Tovah u'Mitukah!

The work of the ICWJ has been fast paced in the last four months.  Thank you all for your volunteer time and financial support. Without you, the ICWJ would not be able to accomplish all that it has.  Of course, the work of the ICWJ always needs more support, especially financially!  If you are due to renew your membership, please go to renew your membership.  Remember that we are also a fully participating agency with United Way of Dane County and participate in all their campaigns.  You can download a flyer to remind your co-workers and post in your newsletters.  United Way flyer  Thank you in advance!

Remember to mark your calendars for our general membership meeting on October 4th from 7:00p.m.-9:00 p.m. at St. Mark’s Lutheran Church, 605 Spruce Street.  This meeting will highlight the Justice for Janitors Campaign with SEIU Local 1 and how we all can help. 

As I mentioned, it has been a busy summer.  Here are just a few of the highlights...

Summer Intern
We cannot talk about the last four months and not highlight our summer volunteer, Josh Healey. Please refer to the article on Cintas to see some of the fruits of Josh’s work, not to mention his countless hours advocating for workers, and working in the ICWJ office.  Thank you Josh!

Campaign for Prosecution for Unpaid Wages
ICWJ volunteers Carol Bracewell and Lori Corbari, local faith leader Reverend Pat Size, Board Members Reverend Kelly Crocker and Joan

Dates to Remember

October 2, 2004 , 9:00am 
Workers' Rights Training
Learn about your rights on the job 
and how to enforce them.
RSVP at 255-0376.

October 4, 2004, 7:00pm
ICWJ General Membership Meeting
St. Mark's Lutheran, Spruce Street
Speaker from the Madison Justice for 
Janitors Campaign

 Grosse, Worker Council Member and staff attorney with the Economic Justice Institute Victoria Selkowe, and I all met with representatives from the Department of Workforce Development and Dane County District Attorney Brian Blanchard regarding the failure to prosecute unpaid wages in Dane County.  Read more below... 

Cintas
Because of timely information in the National Interfaith Coalition for Worker Justice newsletter and a quick-witted ICWJ intern a notoriously anti-union contractor is no longer cleaning city uniforms. Find out more below...

Workers’ Rights Center
Volunteers are putting in about of eighty hours a month at the Workers’ Rights Center and the ICWJ meeting with clients and working to resolve their issues.  We have over 100 open cases and between fifteen to twenty new cases each month. We have quickly established ourselves as a valuable resource in the community almost entirely by word of mouth.

Workers from the Center have participated in the minimum wage campaign, Cintas campaign, unpaid wage enforcement campaign, and in the day-to-day work of the ICWJ.

Read about some big settlements won by the Workers' Rights Center in Spotlight on the Workers' Rights Center!

We sponsored a Workers’ Rights Training in which 30 low-wage workers attended.  This quarter we highlighted violations of minimum wage and overtime laws.  Workers learned about their rights, as well as ways to volunteer with the ICWJ.   

It's been a busy summer and it is shaping up to be a busy Fall.  Come to the membership meeting to find out how to plug in or give us a call at 608-255-0376 to find out how you can help!

I hope you find this newsletter interesting and informative.  We'd love your feedback at staff@workerjustice.org    

Sarah Shatz
ICWJ Director

Wage Claim Enforcement
ICWJ Meets with District Attorney Blanchard

In the Spring of 2003, the Workers' Rights Center Legal Committee met to discuss how to respond to a disturbing allegation.  Unpaid wage claims that were investigated by the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) and referred to the Dane County DA's office were not being prosecuted.  The majority of workers who come into the Workers' Rights Center are there because of unpaid wages.  When the DWD finds that a worker is owed money this finding is supposed to be enforced by the District Attorney.  

The Committee quickly arranged a meeting with DA Brian Blanchard to discuss the situation. Juliet Brodie and Vicky Selkowe from the Neighborhood Law Project (NLP) and Sarah Shatz and Jonathan Rosenblum from the ICWJ attended.   Blanchard explained his office's limited resources and prioritization of other criminal matters.  He wanted claimants to pursue their claims in small claims court or work with non-profits like NLP.  He did agree to have an assistant district attorney (ADA) meet with Selkowe to discuss resolving the backlog.

There were meetings through the summer to try to set up a system that would prioritize cases for the DA to pursue and other cases that would be referred to other organizations.  But in late July the ADA that Selkowe was working with left the office and soon after Blanchard issued a letter saying that his office "lacks the resources to file and prosecute actions for collections of wage complaints," and that they would refer "qualifying claimants" to NLP.

In August 2003, advocates from the Workers' Rights Center met with representatives from the DWD to discuss wage claim enforcement.  DWD Secretary Roberta Gassman send a letter to Blanchard expressing displeasure with Blanchard's position.

In December a story in the Wisconsin State Journal highlighted the lack of enforcement of wage claims by the DA's office. (See link below)  Blanchard continued to dig in his heels and plead lack of funds and other priorities.

Sarah Shatz made contact with the County Executive's office to discuss possible solutions at the county level.  Advocates began researching how other counties were dealing with the same issues.  Advocate Carol Bracewell took a lead on keeping the campaign moving and pulling together the information to find a workable solution.

In July 2004, the ICWJ Board sent a letter to Blanchard demanding that he commit to prosecuting repeat offenders and cases effecting multiple employees as well as working with the ICWJ to find a solution that would result in claims being enforced.

In August 2004, Blanchard failed to receive the Labor endorsement from the SCFL COPE committee because of his stance on wage claim enforcement.  This was followed by an article in the Isthmus highlighting the controversy.  Soon after Blanchard agreed to meet to discuss the situation.

ICWJ volunteers Carol Bracewell and Lori Corbari, local faith leader Reverend Pat Size, Board Members Reverend Kelly Crocker and Joan Grosse, Worker Council Member and staff attorney with the Economic Justice Institute Victoria Selkowe, and Sarah Shatz met with representatives from the Department of Workforce Development and Dane County District Attorney Brian Blanchard regarding the failure to prosecute unpaid wages in Dane County.  Coming out of the meeting the group agreed to the following action items:

1.  Contact the The District Attorney Association with the State of Wisconsin to participate in their yearly conference specifically around wage and hour issues and prosecution of these claims.

Responsible:  Micabil Diaz

Date:  ASAP

2.  Improve communication with low-wage workers about their case once there has been an investigation at DWD.  Bi-lingual information to include information on small claims court, fee waivers, or the DA if it is an appropriate referral. 

Responsible: Jim Chiolino, Sarah Shatz, Victoria Selkowe- Co-Draft Letter, Micabil Diaz-translation

Date: ASAP

3.  Improve communication, outreach, and service to low-wage workers at small claims court.  Front-line training with staff at small claims and court commissioners on particular needs of mono-lingual cases.

Responsible:  Micabil Diaz and Jim Chiolino

Date:  Within the next 3 months

4.  Improve communication between the DWD and the D.A. regarding cases that have a criminal or fraudulent aspect. 

Responsible:  Timara Budack identifies these cases and forwards them to the D.A.’s office. 

Date:  Current

Responsible:   Brian Blanchard will communicate with the DWD regarding the referred cases, so that the DWD may communicate with the workers regarding options for their cases.

Date:  Current

5.  Improve public awareness and set examples by publicizing meritorious cases. 

Responsible:  D.A., ICWJ, DWD

Date:  When appropriate

6.  Investigate the possibility and advocate for the corporation counsel taking these cases.  This is a long-term solution to this problem.

Responsible:  D.A. will take the lead on this.  ICWJ will support these efforts.

Date:  ASAP

The ICWJ will continue to work to assure that workers have a viable and accessible method to collect the wages they have earned.  As State and County budgets continue to tighten the problems of enforcement will increase. 

link to article
Labor in the Pulpits Spotlight
Workers' Rights Center Advocate Carol Bracewell at First Congregational United Church of Christ on Sunday,
August 29, 2004

'I am a fan of bumperstickers. My friends, and perhaps some of you, know my car is covered with them. I don't expect them to change the world, but if they make people think for a moment, that's fine, and I've never been hesitant to share my opinions.

If I could only have one bumpersticker, I'd have this one: "If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention." "Paying attention" means putting forth a little bit of effort to find out what's happening beyond the network news and the local daily paper. There are a lot of independent newspapers, magazines, and web sites available, so that if you want to know what's going on in South America, or South Madison, you can find out if you're willing to pay attention. So that bumpersticker is for everyone.

I have another bumpersticker that says "How would Jesus drive?" Would Jesus be tailgating me like that? Would Jesus be passing me on the right at 10 over? I know not everyone driving is a church-going Christian, so that bumpersticker isn't for everyone, but if it just encourages one person to drive like we're neighbors, it's worth the two bucks.

There is one more bumpersticker I saw somewhere that I want for my car... it says. "The Labor Movement: The folks who brought you the weekend." I like that one a lot. I know that union folks are an even smaller subset of the population than Christians who drive like Jesus would, but that bumpersticker isn't just for union supporters. It's for anyone who has a job or wants a job, or is retiring from a job.

Of all my bumperstickers, I think that one has the greatest potential to make someone think. The concept of the weekend as 2 days a week we don't go to work, is a relatively new concept. If you were a laborer during the 1800s or early 1900s, you were probably working 6 or even 7 days a week, not 5, and they were likely 10 or 12 hours days, not 8.

And it's not just the weekend that has changed for laborers. Many of you have seen the classic black and white photographs by Lewis Hine of immigrant children, slaving in textile factories under inhumane conditions, around the turn of the last century. Today's Child Labor Laws are meant to prevent that tragedy.

And of course we have OSHA laws to protect workers from dangerous equipment. And we have laws about overtime, or at least we did until last week. Workers rights have come a long way because of the tireless efforts of workers to organize for change. So we have reasons to celebrate Labor Day.

As long as I'm talking historically, I'll tell you a story about the first recorded public employee walkout.

A man had travelled far from his home, but he felt a call to return to where he had come from, to organize severely oppressed workers at home. He and his brother contacted government officials to try to begin negotiations. The demands at first were simple - some time off to worship for the public employees. The government negotiators, when they heard the demands, tightened down on the workers, upping the piece rate quotas, and demanding that the workers find their own supplies. Finally, after a series of increasingly disruptive job actions, the government negotiators gave in to the workers' demands for time off, virtually chasing the workers off the job sites. A little while later, however, they had second thoughts and sent out goons to round up the workers, in fact they sent out the national guard and the army after them. You all know how the story ends... The workers were caught between the Army and the Red Sea, and the great labor leader, Moses, parted the Red Sea and lead the workers to safety.

OK, so perhaps I took liberties with the story but it's not that far off. But I want to call to your attention the deep connections between faith and Labor. God called Moses to liberate the Hebrews who were living as slaves. Why? Throughout the Bible, God says many times "I have heard their cry" and "You should treat the less fortunate well, because remember, you were slaves in Egypt, and I liberated you."

The Bible has many lessons about wages, paying workers, and treating workers fairly. Moses is pretty clear in Deuteronomy when he is laying down God's laws. He says "You shall not withhold the wages of poor and needy laborers. You shall pay them their wages because they are poor and their livelihood depends on them; otherwise they might cry to the LORD against you, and you would incur... GUILT."

Notice he doesn't list some other tangible penalty. No fine for not paying workers, no jail time, just good Old Testament Guilt. Remember that, because I'll come back to it.

If you think you can kick back and relax on Labor Day knowing that all these worker woes have been solved, think again. When Lewis Hine photographed immigrants in horrible working conditions in the 1910s, I wonder if he imagined that nearly 100 years later, immigrant workers would face very similar circumstances in America. Now the immigrants are more likely from Mexico and Central America than from Ireland or Eastern Europe. And back then anyone who could get boat fare here could pretty much just walk in the door at Ellis Island, and we know that's no longer true. But the work is still dangerous, the hours long, and while back then, there were few labor laws to be violated, today there are such laws, and they are being violated.

Chicken packing factories in the south are notorious for increasing line rates for workers, who end up cutting off fingers or getting arms smashed in machines. Yes, there are actually garment sweatshops in Los Angeles where mostly immigrant Asian women are literally locked in for hours and live virtually enslaved by their human traffickers, who tell them they have to work-off the cost of smuggling them into this country.

And right here in Madison we have labor and wage problems. Here is a true story. A construction worker fell from a height and was injured at a construction site here in Madison. The employers drove him home to change into clean clothes, before driving him to the hospital where they dropped him off... and told him, "Say you were injured at home, working on the house, and we'll pay for your medical care... if you say you were injured on the job, we won't pay for it." In fact the law says the opposite. If a worker is injured on the job, the employer must fill out an injury form and the workers' medical treatment should be paid for by the employer's insurance. This Madison worker has suffered a permanent disability, is unable to work construction, and has no health insurance. He was disposable to his employer and he has been disposed of.

I know this story because I am a volunteer at the Workers Rights Center on South Park Street. The Workers Rights Center is a project of the Interfaith Coalition for Worker Justice, the ICWJ. Our local ICWJ is one chapter in a national organization. I'm in the pulpit today as part of a national Labor in the Pulpits campaign. Labor unions participate in the ICWJ, as  do houses of worship, Christian, Muslim, and Jewish.

The ICWJ Workers Centers reaches out to low-wage workers, to teach them their rights as workers, to advocate on their behalf, and to help them ultimately to organize and run the workers centers themselves. Anyone is free to make an appointment at the workers center and there is no fee for our help. Some of our cases are about workplace injury. The majority are about unpaid wages.

So what do we do for these workers?

Sometimes we refer them to attorneys, such as in injury cases, because lawyers will take workers comp cases.

For those with unpaid wages, it's a pretty straightforward process. We help the worker try to document the hours worked and what they are owed. We call the employer to see if it's just a misunderstanding. Sometimes it is, and the workers get paid. Most of the time we help the worker file a claim form with the Department of Workforce Development, the DWD. The DWD has investigators who will write to the employer, request payment records, and it often goes back and forth in disagreement. Generally it takes 75 days for the DWD to come to a conclusion, again, all the while the worker has not been paid.

Two and a half months. Often the upaid workers are facing eviction because missing 2 weeks pay means not making rent. The DWD is successful a lot of the time, many employers do not want trouble with the government. If an employer ultimately refuses to pay, the DWD forwards the case to the county district attorney who, under state law, shall investigate and prosecute these cases.

Now let's stop and think a minute. If you are an employer and a worker steals $500 from the cash register, that's clearly a crime, they'd be arrested and put in jail. If, however, you are the worker, and the employer "steals" $500 from you, by not paying you, which is as good as snatching it from your wallet, is it a crime? Well, yes and no. The worker has to use civil law system to file a claim, wait for DWD, and if DWD ultimately finds in the employees favor, great, but the DWD has no enforcement authority. All they can do if the company won't pay, is forward the case to the county district attorney.

Those of you who were Paying Attention and read the Isthmus newspaper last week will know that the Dane County DA has said he will not prosecute wage claims. Will not? No time or money to do so. OK, maybe if they are flashy cases with big dollar amounts or maybe a dozen workers at one company, but those somehow don't come along very often. So you remember when I read you Moses said "You shall pay them their wages  because they are poor and their livelihood depends on them; otherwise they might cry to the LORD against you, and you would incur... GUILT." Well, that's pretty much as it today. I fear that the inaction of the DA has sent a clear message to employers that even if they are wrong in the eyes of the DWD, no prosecution will happen because the DA has real crimes to pursue.

It's true that county budgets are tight, but, to quote a certain vice presidential candidate, it sounds like 2 Americas. Employers who have access to criminal law, and employees who can't even get the civil laws to work for them. The good news is.... as a result of the efforts of the Worker Center, and that newspaper article, we finally got a meeting with the DA this Thursday. And if any of you are so inclined, a letter to the editor of the Isthmus would be much appreciated!!!

Of course, his isn't the only example of injustice to workers.... there are many more stories to tell. It's important to hear the individual stories, to put a real human face on the statistics. But it's also important to look at the big picture. We've all benefited greatly from the improved quality of working conditions in this country, but the laws protecting workers are being eroded and those not being eroded are not being enforced.

Don't think just because your hands are not callused and you don't work construction, that you're safe. White collar workers today are starting to understand what it feels like to be disposable, as tech jobs are shifted overseas. Professional unions of pilots and engineers are realizing that their pension program evaporates when their company "restructures" under new bankruptcy rules. I think, if you're paying attention, you'll see that in our current society, labor in all forms is simply not valued and not honored and not protected, and that goes against our Judeo-Christian tradition.

So of course the question is What can I do to change this? In the local picture, you can of course support the Worker Center, by pledging your money or your time by volunteering. You can write a letter to the editor about enforcing wage laws, and consider how you vote in the county races in November, and in the national elections. You might ask the newspaper why there is always a Business Page, and not a Labor Page.

And if you are in a position of management and you make decisions about employees or profits, ask yourself what Moses would do, what Jesus would do.... to honor workers, to protect workers, to pay a living wage to workers. And when you are relaxing on Labor Day, look at all the people who will be working on that holiday, those clearing your dishes in the restaurants, and scrubbing the floors. You expect stores to be open, but you certainly don't expect to work your salaried job.

Until we learn to identify directly with those who are marginalized, whether as immigrants or as disposable low-wage workers, we will struggle to get up off the couch and come to their aide. Honestly?... one of the reasons I come to church on Sunday is for that kick in the pants, to be reminded that there are injustices out there and that Jesus, Moses, and other prophets said in many different ways, help those less fortunate, help your neighbor, and help the stranger. For me, that's the real test of living out the Christian life from Monday through Saturday.

A former pastor said to me "Can you see Jesus in the faces of the poor?" And to that I would add "Can you see yourself?"

Madison's New Minimum Wage

On March 30, the Madison City Council approved an increase in the municipal minimum wage. The minimum wage that employers must pay their employees with a few exceptions will increase from the current $5.15 to $7.75 by 2008 and then be indexed to rise with inflation.  The Poverty Action Network working closely with Alderman Austin King spearheaded the effort.   ICWJ organized a delegation of low-wage workers and ICWJ volunteers for the Madison City Council public hearing

Making Our Voices Heard
One ICWJ Member's Letter

Dear Alderperson:

My name is Julie Jaksa, and I am a homeowner who lives in District 10.  I have a number of years of experience and education in Human Resource Management, and currently own a small business.  I understand that you are undecided about raising the minimum wage in Madison.  The purpose of this e-mail is to encourage you to vote "YES" on the issue.

Madison is a very expensive city in which to live.  Although we are fortunate that the quality of our city makes it a highly desirable place to live, the increased demand for living in Madison contributes to the high cost of living.  This cost of living is prohibitively expensive for many people.  Quite honestly, it's hard for me to fathom how somebody earning close to minimum wage can even live in this city.  Increasing the minimum wage may help raise the quality of life for these people so that they, too, can enjoy living in Madison.

But the reasons for raising the minimum wage go beyond the fact that it's the "right thing to do."  Although I strongly support economic justice initiatives, I also support what is best for Madison as a whole.  Low wages contribute to the "pooling" of economically-disadvantaged people living in certain parts of the city where others who are more fortunate do not want to live.  I'm sure you know which areas I'm talking about.  This "pooling" affect contributes to increased crime, lowers property values, etc. in these parts of town.  Perhaps raising the minimum wage could partially ease the problems in these areas so they are more manageable.  This is a positive "first step" for solving some of the problems in Madison that affect us all.

I recognize that an increased rate of pay may have the effect of raising certain prices as business owners pass on the increased cost to consumers.  However, I question whether most of us will feel any negative impact.  As an experienced recruiter for both large and small organizations in Madison, I know that it is very difficult to hire somebody for less than $7.00 per hour.  Most businesses are already paying at least the proposed minimum wage of $7.75 per hour.  For example, the prevailing wage for an entry-level landscape laborer (i.e., unskilled labor) is $8.44 per hour in Dane County.  Likewise, wages for entry-level workers in most fast food restaurants exceeded $7.00 over five years ago.  It's time that the remaining jobs in Madison be brought up to this minimal level.

I think it would be enlightening to the public to know what types of jobs are still paying close to the minimum wage.  What trends would we see, and what societal impacts would be clear?  Poverty is often hardest on single mothers.  What is the impact of these low-paying jobs on the children of Madison?  It would probably be shocking for many of us.

As a side note, I support the idea of a lower minimum wage for employing minors (although I would prefer the cut-off to be 18 and not 20 years old).  I have hired young high school students ages 15 to 17 to work in a retail setting in the past (starting pay around $6.25/hour).  It's hard to accept the idea of paying them the same higher rate of pay.  They typically require significant schedule changes to accommodate their classes and after-school activities, and they often lack the maturity to handle jobs in the same way that an adult would handle them.  Obviously there are exceptions, and this conclusion is based on observation and not a scientific study!

I'm certain that there are other arguments, both pro and con, surrounding this  issue.  I appreciate your consideration regarding the issue, and once again    encourage you to vote "Yes" for increasing the minimum wage.  /jj

 

on raising the minimum wage.  Three spoke publicly and all registered in support of the ordinance.  A broad range of ICWJ volunteers, low-wage workers, and faith leaders contacted their alders about the ordinance (See sidebar letter.)

Many of the workers who come into the Workers' Rights Center are currently working at jobs that range between $5.15 and $8.00 and hour.  This means that they must work two jobs just in order to make ends meet.  In raising the minimum wage, which hasn't happened in 7 years, The Madison Common Council took the first steps recognizing the value of low-wage workers.

"This is one of five cities in the country that has a higher municipal wage than the State.  It's a clear statement about how our city values low-wage workers and is hopefully setting an example for other cities and sending a message to the State of Wisconsin that an increase is long overdue."  said Sarah Shatz, ICWJ Director.

"We are pleased that Madison has come together to support dignity in the workplace with livable wages.  We encourage other communities to do the same."  Added Pastor Calvin Harfst, ICWJ Board member.

"All of us have to meet the same needs.  In order to be able to go to work we must pay for housing, food, transportation, clothing, etc.  The current rate of $5.15 and hour is not enough to meet basic needs."  WRC Advocate Claudio Selva said.

The ICWJ will work to spread the word to Employers and Employees about the stepped increase which begins on January 1, 2005.    Download a flyer prepared by the Madison Equal Opportunity Commission that explains Madison's new Minimum Wage Ordinance in English or Spanish.

Link to Madison Ordinance

Madison Rejects Cintas Contract
ICWJ, Labor Groups force City to Uphold Living Wage, Dump Cintas

In late June, the Interfaith Coalition for Worker Justice became aware that the Madison City Council was considering awarding its contract for uniform and laundry services to Cintas Corp., a company notorious for its anti-labor practices around the country. The ICWJ forged a coalition of unions and student groups to successfully pressure the Council to take a closer look, discovering in the process that Cintas had violated the city’s living wage ordinance. After weeks of debate, the Council’s Board of Estimates voted on August 2nd to deny the contract to Cintas and instead grant it to Aramark, which is unionized in Madison. The full city council approved the new contract, worth $135,000 over two years, the next day.

“We’re glad that the city responded to our concerns, “ said Patrick Hickey, ICWJ board member. “Cintas is the exact opposite of the type of company with which Madison should be doing business.”

Cintas, a Cincinnati-based company that is the largest industrial launderer in North America, had originally been selected by a city purchasing committee to receive the contract to supply and clean uniforms for Madison Metro and other city agencies. It came under scrutiny, however, after admitting at the July 12th board meeting that under the company’s service agreement with the city Parking Utility signed in 2001, Cintas paid its workers $8.25/hour, far below the $9.74 living wage required for employees of firms providing more than $5,000 in services to the city.

The board's decision to reject Cintas "puts everybody who does business with the city on notice that the living wage is important," but also means the city must carefully apply the law, said Melanie Conklin, spokeswoman for Mayor Dave Cieslewicz.

Cintas maintained that it had committed no wrongdoing, as the Parking Utility contract did not mention the required living wage. City officials acknowledged that they had failed to inform Cintas of the ordinance when the contract was first signed. Yet when asked by the board whether the company had raised it employee’s salaries since it had been informed of the living wage law, Cintas manager Greg Kaldor replied, “no…we were never explicitly told we needed to change anything.”

Council members expressed concern that the living wage policy was not being implemented as intended when the City Council approved the ordinance in 1999. Referring to city staff’s advice that Cintas could comply with the law by increasing wages a mere two cents, council president Brenda Konkel, the alder who most forcefully opposed Cintas, commented, “This is not how the ordinance was supposed to work."

This is the first time since the ordinance’s passage that a company had been challenged for failing to comply, and both alders and activists recommended reforms to ensure enforcement of the law. “Madison made a commitment to only deal with companies that treat their workers right,” said Tony Schultz of the Student Labor Action Coalition. “But this whole Cintas thing shows that right now there’s no teeth to the living wage. Neither the company nor the city is held accountable.”

Besides the living wage violations, Cintas also came under fire for allegations of other questionable practices. According to South Central Federation of Labor President Jim Cavanaugh, Cintas workers face “poverty wages, unsafe working conditions, racial and sexual discrimination, and anti-union intimidation” across the U.S.  A former Cintas worker contacted by the ICWJ Workers’ Rights Center wrote a letter to the Board that spoke of the racism he experienced at the Madison plant: “The managers treated the Latinos with no respect; often they made fun of us and called us names. They gave the better jobs to the Americans and the Asians, and worst jobs--the dirtiest ones with the lowest pay--they gave to us, the Latinos.”

Criticism against Cintas was not limited to job conditions: in May of this year, the Sierra Club of Milwaukee reached a settlement with Cintas over alleged violations of the Clean Water Act by dumping polluted wastewater and laundry chemicals.

Deciding to take the unionized Aramark over the non-union Cintas was made easier by the fact that Aramark actually put in a cheaper bid and would save Madison taxpayers over $3000/year. As Alder Tim Bruer put it, "This is one of those times where social and economic justice is in line with fiscal responsibility." 

Despite all of the charges against Cintas that continued to emerge, the Board delayed taking any action on the contract at three consecutive meetings citing legal concerns. It was only until the August 2nd meeting, when 15 people registered against awarding Cintas the contract and many more had called or written their alders, did the council members bring forward a motion to be voted on.

John Bayley, a Madison Metro bus driver and member of Teamsters Local 695 contacted by ICWJ volunteers, gave one of the more powerful testimonies when he read a letter expressing Metro drivers’ desire to not wear Cintas uniforms. The letter, signed by almost 50 Metro employees in only one day, stated their “support for living wages for all workers, union and nonunion.”

After hearing testimony and having a closed session with the city attorney, the Board voted unanimously to drop Cintas in favor of Aramark for the new contract. For Bayley, the victory “showed how much more strength we can have when we’re united…

I don’t feel that same spirit of solidarity in the labor movement very much anymore—it was exciting to see so many different groups working together on this.”

Some have claimed that given Aramark’s own anti-labor reputation elsewhere, Madison gave the contract to a company no better than Cintas. Rosie Reml, president of UNITE HERE 229, which represents around 100 workers at Aramark, responded to this sentiment by commenting that although “Aramark is far from a model employer around the country, at least here in Madison we have a union shop, so we have better wages and benefits and a say on the job.

Added the ICWJ’s Patrick Hickey, “This wasn’t about Cintas vs. Aramark. This was about whether the city of Madison stands up for workers who earn a living wage and have a voice on the job . In this case, Madison made the right decision and took the workers’ side.”

link to articles

Lands' End Update
Just Garments' Union Recognized

An article in April's newsletter detailed the ongoing struggle for workers at Just Garments to fight union-busting.  The ICWJ worked closely with the Workers' Rights Consortium, Madison Arcatao Sister City Project, the Student Labor Action Coalition and others to apply local pressure on Wisconsin-based Lands' End to address the problems faced by workers at Just Garments.

(From Just Garments Website)
JUST GARMENTS is a company that was created out of negotiations that ended a labor conflict in El Salvador. The conflict resulted when the STIT union solicited collective bargaining from a Taiwanese company in April 2002 and the company responded by shutting down its operations. STIT and CEAL initiated an international campaign that quickly received the support of organizations in Asia, the United States, and Latin America. The textile union UNITE , the AFL-CIO, the International Textile Federation (ITGLWF), US-Leap, Campaign for Labor Rights, USAS, Focus on Globalization and many other organizations joined forces to bring about the November 2002 agreement which led to the creation of Just Garments in April 2003.

Just Garments is contracting the STIT-affiliated workers who lost their jobs in April 2002 and were subsequently blacklisted from obtaining employment in other factories.   (The Worker's Rights Consortium released a report about the blacklisting with regards to a factory in El Salvador that sews for “Lands End”). Just Garments has been financed by the Taiwanese corporation “Tainan Enterprises”.   Tainan 's April 2002 closing of its Salvadoran operations led to a series of events which culminated in the corporation assuming responsibility for its actions with regards to the workers.

JUST GARMENTS is fruit of the resistance of Salvadoran workers and the efforts of many people around the world.   Never has a business in Central America that shut down operations when collective bargaining was solicited been able to reopen again. Just Garments has the current capacity to employee 300 people and began producing in January 2004. Once all of the legal paperwork is in order, STIT and Just Garments will sign a collective contract as per the November 2002 agreement. Companies such as the GAP and Phillip Van Heusen have offered to place orders with Just Garments.

The Lands End company has provided technical support and has donated fabric and machines. Tainan Enterprises has provided the majority of the necessary capital and machines so that this company is possible by way of Mr. Donald Wu, the majority shareholder.

www.justgarments.net 


Workers' Rights Center Spotlight
In each issue of the newsletter we choose a case, client, issue or volunteer advocate to highlight.  Names of workers and employers are withheld for confidentiality reasons.

In this issue we want to mention two spectacular settlements that our volunteer advocates and community allies have won.

On a Thursday night in May, volunteer advocate Claudio Selva came in for his usual shift to meet with workers who were having problems on the job.  That night Claudio met with a worker who had been fired from a restaurant that he/she had been at for many years.  Because the employee was 'at will' winning the job back was not an option, but in their discussion it came out that the worker had put in overtime for years but never received overtime pay.  Claudio asked the worker to calculate the hours he/she had worked.  Fortunately, the worker had kept scrupulous records, including copies of punch cards and check stubs.

"We discussed filing with the Department of Workforce Development and then contacted the Employer to see if we could work things out informally,"  Said Selva.  With the assistance of Vicky Selkowe Staff Attorney with the Economic Justice Institute, they were able to mediate a settlement to get the worker the nearly $9000 in unpaid overtime.

"Mediation is often the best way to go especially when the facts of the case are so clear," said Selkowe.  "Talking directly to the Employer can often get things resolved much more quickly than relying solely on State enforcement."

"This is the kind of assistance that volunteer advocates at the Workers' Rights Center are giving to people everyday," said Director Sarah Shatz.  "  Empowering low-income workers with information and support so that they can demand fair treatment and full compensation for their work."

In another case that began at the Workers' Rights Center, advocate Martin Alvarado met with a worker at an area laundry who had been fired after taking a leave that should have been covered by the Family Medical Leave Act.  The ICWJ teamed up with UNITE HERE which represents laundry workers nationally  to line up legal representation for the worker who filed a Family Medical Leave Act violation.  The worker was reinstated, and received a full year of back pay.

"There are laws on the books that protect workers," said Board member Ann McNeary.  "But they aren't always followed.  the Workers' Rights Center plays a crucial role in helping educate and advocate for workers."   

Newsletter Archive

Copyright © 2003
For assistance with the website contact director@workerjustice.org